You have recently been appointed by an investment

You have recently been appointed by an investment company who wish to relaunch Carillion under a new name after recently buying the business but they have concerns over the problems that caused Carillion’s share price to fall.

The primary theme of the paper is You have recently been appointed by an investment company who wish to relaunch Carillion under a new name after recently buying the business but they have concerns over the problems that caused Carillion’s share price to fall. in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $149 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.


Title:  Carillion: Analyse what went wrong and create a project plan for establishing a new business

Summary: This is an individual assignment; you need to discuss what went wrong using project management concepts, for the project described in the following pages. Please read this whole document carefully.

This involves the analysis of a real failure in a project based business i.e. Carillion and discussion of other relevant issues.

More detail on the assignment requirements is provided in the project brief that follows.

This assignment is worth 50% of the total mark for the Project Management Leadership and Skills module. The other 50% will be assessed by a second assignment.

Module learning outcomes covered by this assignment

Apply knowledge of the theory and practice of project planning and control and the use of Project Management methods and techniques.

  • Demonstrate a sound understanding of the importance of Project Management in the development and maintenance of sustainable and global organisations operating in complex market environments
  • Develop knowledge and application of the techniques of estimating, forecasting and resource management
  • Work independently and with others in analysing and presenting solutions to Project Management planning, control and process problems.
  • Communicate effectively through a variety of media to different audiences.
  • Make decisions in complex and unpredictable situations using tools and techniques appropriate to the module.
  • Use terminology associated with the subject area accurately and in a way which demonstrates sophisticated knowledge and understanding.


Carillion`s risky road shows the short, sharp shocks of building for the long term

The Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route was billed as a “major infrastructure project that will significantly ­improve travel in north eastScotland”. But, for Carillion at least, it has turned out to be a major headache that significantly hurt its finances.

The troubled firm was part of the consortium – with partners Balfour Beatty and Galliford Try – that was awarded the contract to build the road in December 2014.

At the time, the decision was widely welcomed by both the Scottish Government and the local council. There had been a long wait for the 36-mile (58km) route and the project was expected to provide thousands of jobs for local people, many of whom had suffered as the oil industry slowed.

However, at somepointthe scheme went wildly off course. Indeed, the road in Aberdeen typifies Carillion’s problems: a project that should have been relatively simple has been dogged by delays, pushing costs up and leaving the firm with a serious cashflow problem.

It is likely to be one of a handful of projects that contributed to the £845m write-down Carillion announced two weeks ago, along with two further UK projects and others in the Middle East and Canada.

At the heart of the matter lies a problem of procurement: why do contractors often get the prices and timescales on major projects so wrong? It all comes down to risk, and who is willing to take it, explains Richard Steer, chairman of construction consultancy Gleeds.

Contractors are the risk takers, which is where they can make their profits, but it can backfireRichard Steer, chairman of Gleeds

“Naturally the client wants to minimise their exposure to risk,” he says. “Contractors are the risk takers, which is where they can make their profits, but it can backfire.”

Companies are forced to bid for five or 10-year projects at a fixed cost, particularly when the client is a public sector body, he says.

“What’s been happening is that contractors have been pitching for jobs and they’ll put a price in. Then they start talking to subcontractors, and then the subcontractors come back with prices that are more expensive.”

He says that the current environment, where there is a shortage of labour, means costs have risen for subcontractors. It is also notoriously difficult to predict what the labour market or the cost of materials, such as steel, will be over the life of a project, meaning that a fixed cost at the start of a contract might seem wildly ambitious by the end. Allthis chipsaway at wafer-thin margins, which could be only 2pc to start with.

Others have suggested that the problem for Carillion and its peers lies in the subcontractors themselves. Over the years, companies have cut back on what is carried out in-house, meaning they have less control over the work being done.

In Aberdeen, Carillion, Balfour Beatty and Galliford Try tendered for subcontractors to do work including drainage, plant and equipment hire, earthworks, steel reinforcement and rock crushing, through contracts worth almost £200m.

“Contractors are increasingly really struggling to manage their business,” says Mark Farmer, who recently wrote a Government-commissioned report called Modernise or Die on improving construction efficiency.

“Although employing subcontractors helps businesses avoid a large payroll and keeps overheads down, it does have its downsides,” he says. “Many companies now want to have more control over who’s delivering the work, which means moving away from subcontractors.”

Some might say that Carillion should have predicted the problems it would face in Aberdeen. The new road route had been on the cards for nine years before it was finally approved by ministers in 2012; by then, the cost of the scheme had swelled from an initial government estimate of between £295m and £395m,to £745m.

Many companies now want to have more control over who’s delivering the work, which means moving away from subcontractorsMark Farmer

The consortium had to fight off three other groups in order to win the contract, amid fierce bidding and ministerial pressure to keep the cost of the project down.

Construction finally gotunder wayin February 2015, with the road due to open later this year. But by November 2016 it became clear the target was not going to be met. The consortium had failed to carry out crucial work on the site before winter began, meaning they had to delay until the weather became warmer. More minor problems, including delays brought about by fears over pollution risks to nearby rivers, added weeks at a time to the project.

At the time, Keith Brown, the Scottish transport minister, told a worried public that the cost of the delays would be borne by the contractors, not by taxpayers.

“The contractor is only paid when the road is open. The only payments that we make in relation to the road being completed are those set out in the contract,” he told a meeting of the Scottish Government’s rural economy and connectivity committee. Amid concerns that many large public contracts are being put in private hands, politicians have been keen to spend as little public money as possible, ensuring that locals can see value in large projects.

But this means that contractors are often put in a difficult position, says Joe Brent,analystat Liberum.

“The public perception is that these companies have been gouging out the eyes of government for ages, but it’s actually the other way round,” he says.

“They are often under pressure to take on contracts at very unattractive terms.”

It is not just Carillion that has suffered on the Aberdeen road project: two months ago, Galliford Try announced that it had been forced to set aside £98m to cover the costs of completing two major infrastructure jobs – one of which is thought to be the Aberdeen project and the other the Queensferry Crossing in Scotland.

Every time work is pushed back or they run into a problem, companies have to shell out more money for extra labour costs, extra materials, machine hire and a host of other costs.

What’s more, once they are in trouble, many companies do not own many assets, and so have difficulty raising money to bail themselves out. “There are other ways of procuring, such as two-stage tendering where more risks are transferred to the customer,” says Mr Brent.

Mr Steer agrees: “What should happen is clients should be more flexible in their approach in accepting and allocating risk,” he says. “It’s a fine line that they’re treading.”

What is clear is that there is a pinch point between the needs of the client and the contractor, which comes down to having to offer work at a competitive rate, while also making sure that the work can be carried outforthe right cost.

The Scottish Government, through Mr Brown, has insisted that the Aberdeen road project will not be affected by Carillion’s recent woes and it is now scheduled to open next year. But for Carillion, the troublesome road is merely indicative. If it is to survive, it, along with many of its rivals, may have to completely rethink the way it does business.

Carillion under pressure to inject funds amid growing pension concerns

15 July 2017 •8:00pm

Stricken building contractor Carillion is facing growing calls to launch an emergency fundraising as it threatens to plunge further into financial crisis.

It has emerged that the Government is rapidly severing links with big UK outsourcers, cutting off a vital source of revenue and exacerbating the damage to the company’s fragile balance sheet.

Carillion is one of the biggest casualties of a public procurement blitz that has resulted in Whitehall reducing its reliance on large outsourcers to less than 5pc of the total public sector contracts awarded in the last 12 months.

The value of the contracts it has won from the public sector has plummeted 81pc, making it second only to rival Capita in the list of those who have lost out, according to new research fromTussell, the analyst.

It comes amid fresh figures that show Carillion’s debt is set to spiral to almost £700m in the first half of this year, and its pension deficit could more than double to £800m.

Shares in Carillion finished 70pc lower on Friday night, after a stunning profit warning earlier in the week. Over four extraordinary days, almost £600m was wipedfromits stock market value amid aggressive hedge fundshorting. It is estimated that speculative investors made around £140m betting against the shares.

Carillion is one of Britain’s largest construction and support services companies, employing 50,000 worldwide.

The Sunday Telegraph understands that pension trustees favour a rights issue as a way of injecting cash into the business and shoring up its retirement scheme. Carillion’s £2.3bn pension fund had a deficit of £393m at the end of 2015. This could have grown to as much as £800m, according to Stephen Rawlinson, the independent analyst.

Andrew Nussey at Peel Hunt said the firm “probably needs to raise £500m through disposals and an equity raise”, and other analysts suggested that a fundraising would be a more likely rescue strategy.

Carillion is the most shorted stock on the UK market, and while the overall amount of shorted shares had fallen slightly between Monday and Friday, there had not been a wider sell-out.

Some funds, including AHL Partners and Gladstone Capital Management, had actually increased their short position during the week, suggesting that they thought the share price still had further to fall.

After Monday’s profit warning, Keith Cochrane, Carillion’s rapidly appointed chief executive, said he would be undertaking an urgent root and branch review of the business that may include the sale of some of its divisions.

However, no one business is valuable enough to solve Carillion’s cash flow problems, meaning it would have to butcher its portfolio in order to raise enough cash. While the problems lie mostly in its construction arm, its support services unit has signed new contracts for the coming year.

Carillion could also try to woo rivals Balfour Beatty and Kier, who compete with Carillion on construction work, to launch rescue takeover bids. However, both have ruled out a deal for now.

Mike van Dulken, analyst at Accendo Markets suggested that without serious financial intervention, the company could sink without a trace.

Assignment Brief

You have recently been appointed by an investment company who wish to relaunch Carillion under a new name after recently buying the business but they have concerns over the problems that caused Carillion’s share price to fall.  Your assignment is to write a report on the business and what went wrong using project management concepts and ideas: areas for discussion may include: the nature of projects and project organisational structures; what has to be managed in pm and what was not done in this case; whether Carillion has considered portfolio or program management and risk; why things have gone wrong and what could be done about this; who were or are the stakeholders and what was their influence.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written
Tailored to your instructions