DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP

The primary theme of the paper is DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $109 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

Task

Background

Refer to background information provided in Assessment 1 regarding the Commonwealth Government ‘My Health Record’ project.

Complete the Following

Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.

Consider that funding has been approved for a project to build a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told, and give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. You are the business systems analyst assigned to the project, you will need to produce:

Stakeholder map

Draw stakeholder role names on a stakeholder map with 4 quadrants, Internal-Operation, Internal-Executive, External-Operation, External-Executive
For each stakeholder, describe why they have an interest in the project.

Questionnaire

Create one questionnaire that you would send to one stakeholder group with an aim to help you identify further details about the environment, the problem area and/or how the system would operate to help solve the problem.

Identify which stakeholder you are going to send the questionnaire to
Write an introduction statement that would go with the questionnaire explaining the purpose of the questionnaire
Write 10 questions, either open and/or closed ended questions
This should be written as a questionnaire that could be distributed
Only write the questions, you should not write the answers

Use Case diagram and descriptions

Draw a use case model for the information system
Write brief Use Case description for each Use Case in the diagram
Write onefully developed Use Case description for one of the important Use Cases identified. Select an important Use Case that is key part of the system, not a basic simple Use Case.

Rationale

This assessment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:

apply stakeholder analysis for of an information system;
describe and apply requirements gathering techniques;
define functional requirements

Marking criteria

Criteria	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (DI)	Credit (CR)	Pass (PS)	Fail (FL)
1.Stakeholder map Maximum 5 Marks	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.	Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholders.	Demonstrates understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Lists Stakeholders.	Has not demonstrated understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate.
2.Questionnaire Maximum 5 Marks	10 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material.	7 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material.	5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material.	3 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts.	1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
3.Functional Requirements Maximum 16 Marks	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references Maximum 4 Marks	Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.	Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors.	Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors.

DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP