This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A1: List three environmental cues and indicate how they influence your expectations for communication?
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A2: Does the communicator have a responsibility to the audience? Does the audience have a responsibility to the speaker? Provide a justification for your view.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A6: Is there ever a justifiable use for doublespeak? Why or why not? Explain your response and give some examples.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A7: Find an article or listen to a presentation that uses signposts. Identify the signposts and explain how they help the audience follow the article or presentation.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A10: What does the field of psychology offer concerning the self-fulfilling prophecy?
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A11: How does the process of perception limit our view, or expand it? Can we choose how to perceive things?
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A15: How does the intended audience influence the choice of words and use of language in a document? Think of a specific topic and two specific kinds of audiences. Then write a short example of how this topic might be presented to each of the two audiences.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A16: Create a sales letter for an audience that comes from a culture other than your own. Identify the culture and articulate how your message is tailored to your perception of your intended audience.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A21: Is it important to consider the rhetorical situation? Provide a justification for your view.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion
A23: Does organising a presentation involve ethics? Explain your response.
|
4.0 Pts
Full marks
Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources
|
3.0 Pts
Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources
|
2.0 Pts
Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question
|
1.0 Pts
Superficial or partial response
|
0.0 Pts
No response or response did not address question
|
0.0 Pts
No marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
Total points: 40.0
|