1.1 Evaluate existing e-business websites accordin

1.1 Evaluate existing e-business websites according to established rules of web design

The primary theme of the paper is 1.1 Evaluate existing e-business websites according to established rules of web design in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $149 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

LO

Learning outcome

(LO)

Assessment Criteria

(AC)

In this assessment you will have the opportunity to present evidence that shows you are able to:

Task no.

LO 1

Assess the design and

functionality of existing and established e-business sites

1.1

Evaluate existing e-business websites according to established rules of web design

1

1.2

Apply software for evaluating design to existing sites and your own site(s)

1

 

 

LO 2

Examine a range of web

authoring tools for creating multimedia websites

2.1

Briefly describe the different mark-up and scripting languages

3

 

 

2.2

Investigate the features of a range of commercial web authoring tools

2

 

2.3

Evaluate the suitability of a selected range of commercial web authoring tools

2

LO 3

 

Develop an integrated set of web pages/frames

3.1

Produce a complex set of linked interactive pages, using a range of authoring tools, including mark-up languages and drawing from existing scripting language resources

3

3.2

Use a range of devices to collect graphical data

3

LO 4

 

Develop interactive

applications on a web server

4.1

Use a web server to host an e-business website interface

3

4.2

Design, write and test an interactive application in a suitable language

3

4.3

Manage the integrity of files on the server

3

 

 







 

 

 

 

 

Case Study/Background Info – Part 1



Feedback

Strengths

 

Areas for Improvement

Lecturer Signature:  Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case Study/Background Info – Part 2

 

 

Feedback

Strengths

 

Areas for Improvement

Lecturer Signature:   Date:

 

 

 

 


Case Study/Background Info – Part 3

 

 

Feedback

Strengths

 

Areas for Improvement

Lecturer Signature:  Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

In addition to the above PASS criteria, this assignment gives you the opportunity to submit evidence in order to achieve the following MERIT and DISTINCTION grades

 

Grade Descriptor

 

Indicative characteristic/s

 

Contextualisation

M1. Identify and apply design best practices for the Website

  • Effective judgements have been made
  • An effective approach to study and research has been applied

To achieve M1, effective judgements will have to be made in order to accurately identify and apply Website design best practices.

To be achieved in: Part 1

M2. Understanding and Application of Scripting Languages

  • Appropriate discussion and use of Mark-up and scripting language.

To achieve M2, you must use a Client Side scripting language (i.e. JavaScript) for advanced Form validation.

 

To be achieved in: Part 2

D1. Use critical thinking create complex set of linked pages and use advanced graphics

  • Rich graphics and correctly linked web pages for interactivity and ease of navigation

To achieve D1, you must use a range of Software tools to collect and manipulate graphical components in logically linked and interactive web pages.

 

To be achieved in: Part 2

D2. Demonstrate understanding of testing, hosting environments and security issues

  • A test document and the website is hosted in an appropriate hosting environment with security measures in place

To achieve D2, evidence of testing and identification of appropriate hosting solution with the right level of security must be provided.

 

To be achieved in: Part 3

 

Student Grades

 

  • Each Unit will be graded as a Pass, Merit, Distinction, Referred or Withheld 
  • Pass is awarded for the achievement of all Learning Outcomes against the specified Assessment Criteria.
  • Merit or Distinction is awarded for higher level achievement.
  • If all Learning Outcomes have not been achieved the work is Referred
  • Where there is some doubt or concern regarding the origin of some of the content, the work is withheld. The student will then be interviewed to ascertain originality.
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written
Tailored to your instructions