What is the “small but healthy” hypothesis?

What is the “small but healthy” hypothesis?

The primary theme of the paper is What is the “small but healthy” hypothesis? in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $99 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

Anthropology: What is the Small but healthy hypothesis

INSTRUCTIONS:
only intext citations are need for this paper. Here is the prompt for this paper! What is the “small but healthy” hypothesis? What benefits are conferred by “smallness” in environments of limited nutritional resources? How might these benefits be seen to be an adaptive response? Critics have argued that the small-but-healthy argument bears dangerous implications – that there is no urgent need to direct nutritional resources to the vast majority of undernourished individuals because they are well adapted within their environment. Why else might it be inappropriate to describe “smallness” as a healthy adaptation to nutritional stress? After considering both sides of this argument, which position do you favor? be very persuasive about your argument...!!
CONTENT:
SMALL BUT HEALTHY HYPOTHESIS: The “small but healthy hypothesis” was proposed by Secler David in the 1980`s and it was developed on four points. The first point stated that the adults in developing countries have small bodies because of the poor diets and infections which occur during childhood and therefore the small body sizes were attributes which were desirable for the populations and the causes (Solomons, 2007). The second point was that monitoring of the growing children was recognized widely as excellent tools to detect the health problems and therefore retardation of growth was a warning signal of an increased mortality and morbidity and not an innocuous response of the environmental stimulus. This hypothesis was proposed by an economist, David Seckler and it has generated heated debates and lively literature. This hypothesis has created thoughtful and emotionally charged rebuttals from different nutritionists such as Latham (1984) and Gopalan (1983). The economist`s views sparked a lot of interest because they resulted in programmatic and policy implications which were different from the conventional (Seckler, 1982) The “Small but healthy” hypothesis referred to an environment in which the calamity of malnutrition was not of massive proportions because most of the world was “small but healthy”. In Seckler`s view, the only people who were truly malnourished were those one who showed clinical symptoms of malnutrition. The latter, he says, should be giv...
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions