Quantitative Research Critique - Research critique

Quantitative Research Critique - Research critique part 2

The primary theme of the paper is Quantitative Research Critique - Research critique part 2 in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $99 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

Quantitative Research Critique - Research critique part 2

INSTRUCTIONS:
Research Critique, Part 2 View Rubric Due Date: Oct 27, 2013 23:59:59 Max Points: 150 Details: Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. Each study analysis will be 750-1,000 words and submitted in one document. Refer to the resource Research Critique, Part 2. Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Submit the assignment along with an electronic version of the article used for the analysis. If an electronic version is not available, submit a clean unmarked copy of the article. NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart2Guidelines_student.docx
CONTENT:
Quantitative Research CritiqueAuthor`s NameInstitutionA quantitative study by Farmer et al. (2012) has been chosen for appraisal. The study is a randomized controlled trial regarding adherence to glucose lowering medications in the long-term treatment of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). It compares the adherence patterns of two groups, where the first is treated to a nurse-led consultation intervention, and the other receives the usual care. This paper will critically appraise sections of the article in order to gain an in depth understanding. The focus of appraisal is on the problem statement, protection of human participants, data collection, data analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings.Problem StatementThe authors identified the problem from the onset in a clear and comprehensible manner. They noted that T2DM was a disease increasing in prevalence. Henceforth, they undertook a study to find the best practices in increasing adherence to glucose lowering medication, so as to decrease the disease burden. The authors noted that this was the first study of its kind, and it aimed at filling knowledge deficits in the care and follow-up of diabetic patients (Farmer et al., 2012).Protection of Human ParticipantsThe authors addressed the benefits of the study to the participants. The participants were to benefit from increased adherence to glucose lowering medication. This would mean proper sugar control among the subjects. The study did not pose any risks to the par...
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions