Home Solutions GAAS requires auditors to investigate a subsequent event
We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
The primary theme of the paper is GAAS requires auditors to investigate a subsequent event in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $99 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.
1. GAAS requires auditors to investigate a subsequent event (see separate post.) What would be the effect of such an event, if any, on the dating of the opinion?2. When it comes to subsequent events, the auditor is required by Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) to search for and to evaluate subsequent events up to the date of the auditor’s report, that date usually corresponds to the end of field work. To comply with GAAS the auditor should remain alert for subsequent events in performing year-end substantive tests after the balance sheet date and should perform specific procedures at or near the completion of field work. What would be an example of such specific procedures? Explain3. There are three general sets of activities that must be performed to complete an audit. These include completing field work, evaluating findings, and communicating with the client. As part of completing the field work, the auditor must make a review of subsequent events. Subsequent events are events that occur between the balance sheet date and the issuance date of the auditor’s report that may affect the financial statements on which the report is rendered. Such reviews 1) may provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet and affect the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements or 2) may provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose subsequent to that date. How do you think each type of event would be addressed by the auditor?