Home Solutions Explain and analyse the modern relevance of key constitutional doctrines and be able to debate such issues from a legal and ethical perspective
We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
The primary theme of the paper is Explain and analyse the modern relevance of key constitutional doctrines and be able to debate such issues from a legal and ethical perspective in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $99 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.
Knowledge and Understanding
Ref A. Students should be able to:
K2 Explain and analyse the modern relevance of key constitutional doctrines and be able to debate such issues from a legal and ethical perspective
Ref B. Students should be able to:
C1 Show an ability to begin to reflect critically and identify gaps in their knowledge and acquire new knowledge with feedback and guidance from tutors
C2 Show an ability to distinguish between different sources and assess their merits and relevance and arrive at a reasoned choice
Professional Skills and Attitudes
Ref C. Students should be able to:
P2 Analyse cases and statutes and derive appropriate conclusions concerning the state of the law and how it applies in the context of practical problems
General Transferable Skills
Ref D. Students should be able to:
T1 Communicate effectively.
The coursework question is in three parts. You must ensure you address all three parts.
‘The Secretary of State must be free to give full weight to foreign policy considerations, which are not justiciable. However, that does not mean the whole process is immune from judicial scrutiny.
’ per Lord Phillips, R (on the application of Abbasi) & Another v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 1598, at para 99
1. Explain the origins and nature of prerogative power as a source of UK constitutional law and practice (500 words);
2. Evaluate how the Court of Appeal in Abbasi balanced on the one hand foreign policy considerations and on the other hand the need to control discretionary power. Do you believe that they got the balance correct, and why do you take that view? (1,000 words).
3. Evaluate what the judgments of the Courts in Abbasi and other cases on the royal prerogative in foreign policy and defence demonstrate about the Courts’ approach to separation of powers. (1,000 words).
Check Out Our Original Reviews