Home Solutions Discuss the quality of the following types of audit evidence, giving two examples of each form of evidence.
We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
The primary theme of the paper is Discuss the quality of the following types of audit evidence, giving two examples of each form of evidence. in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $99 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.
Question Audit evidence(a) Discuss the quality of the following types of audit evidence, giving two examples of each form ofevidence.(i) Evidence originated by the auditors(ii) Evidence created by third parties(iii) Evidence created by the management of the client(b) Describe the general considerations which auditors must bear in mind when evaluating auditevidence.Answer(a) Quality of audit evidence(i) Evidence originated by the auditorsThis is in general the most reliable type of audit evidence because there is little risk that itcan be manipulated by management.Examples(1) Analytical procedures, such as the calculation of ratios and trends in order toexamine unusual variations(2) Physical inspection or observation, such as attendance at inventory counts(3) Reperformance of calculations making up figures in the accounts, such as thecomputation of total inventory values(ii) Evidence created by third partiesThird party evidence is more reliable than client-produced evidence to the extent that it isobtained from independent sources. Its reliability will be reduced if it is obtained fromsources which are not independent, or if there is a risk that client personnel may be able toand have reason to suppress or manipulate it.Examples(1) Circularisation of trade receivables or payables, confirmation of bank balances.(2) Reports produced by experts, such as property valuations, actuarial valuations, legalopinions. In evaluating such evidence, the auditors need to take into account theexpert’s qualifications, independence and the terms of reference for the work.(3) Documents held by the client which were issued by third parties, such as invoices,price lists and statements. These may sometimes be manipulated by the client andso are less reliable than confirmations received directly.(iii) Evidence created by managementThe auditors cannot place the same degree of reliance on evidence produced by clientmanagement as on that produced outside the company. However, it will often be necessaryto place some reliance on such evidence. The auditors will need to obtain audit evidencethat the information supplied is complete and accurate, and apply judgement in doing so,taking into account previous experience of the client’s reliability and the extent to which theclient’s representations appear compatible with other audit findings, as well as themateriality of the item under discussion.Examples(1) The company’s accounting records and supporting schedules. Although these areprepared by management, the auditors have a statutory right to examine suchrecords in full: this right enhances the quality of this information.(2) The client’s explanations of, for instance, apparently unusual fluctuations in results.Such evidence requires interpretation by the auditors and, being oral evidence, onlylimited reliance can be placed upon it.(3) Information provided to the auditors about the internal control system. The auditorsneed to confirm that this information is accurate and up-to-date, and that it does notsimply describe an idealised system which is not adhered to in practice.(b) General considerations in evaluating audit evidenceAudit evidence will often not be wholly conclusive. The auditors must obtain evidence which issufficient and appropriate to form the basis for their audit conclusions. The evidence gatheredshould also be relevant to those conclusions, and sufficiently reliable to form the basis for theaudit opinion. The auditors must exercise skill and judgement to ensure that evidence is correctlyinterpreted and that only valid inferences are drawn from it.Certain general principles can be stated. Written evidence is preferable to oral evidence;independent evidence obtained from outside the organisation is more reliable than that obtainedinternally; and evidence generated by the auditors is more reliable than that obtained from others.
Check Out Our Original Reviews