Determine at least three (3) ways which companies

Determine at least three (3) ways which companies or organizations utilize such technologies to improve business efficiency

The primary theme of the paper is Determine at least three (3) ways which companies or organizations utilize such technologies to improve business efficiency in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $109 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

In groups of three or four, you will be required to conduct research on AIS/ERP Systems for your client. Your team is required to pick a case study in one of the areas mentioned below (not limited to). Then prepare a Business Report for the client detailing the processes of selecting an AIS/ERP to help them to make informed decision for investment in information system to take their business to the next level including:

 

  1. 1. Define business processes,
  2. 2. Develop business requirements,
  3. 3. Determine the systems requirements,
  4. 4. Software and vendor selection
  5. 5. Determine at least three (3) ways which companies or organizations utilize such technologies to improve business efficiency
  6. 6. Evaluate the level of efficiency of the technology implementation
  7. 7. Examine potential security risks, data breaches
  8. 8. Provide guidelines on how these risks could be mitigated.

 

The report should be about 3000 words and should be submitted in an MSWord format document for the client. Each group would be required to find AIS/ERP that addresses the different aspects of the clients’ business especially the area of their enumerated challenges and should also ensure that the client’s business requirements are addressed. You may also employ any analysis or design tool in the preparation of your report – so long as the results are suitable for presentation in the required Word document and are your own work.

 

Remember: this is a report intended to convince a board of directors to adopt your

proposal. Your report must therefore be complete, yet concise; be clear and convincing, and professionally presented. Above all, the report must be specific to the needs of the business.

 

Case Studies in the areas of: (The team needs to email the lecturer their choice)

 

Public Transport

 

Immigration

 

Flight Centres

 

Health

 

Real state agencies

 

Medicine

 

Education

 

Pollution

 

Library

 

Manufacturing

 

Banks

 

Agriculture

 

Type/Score

Very Good (10/10)

Good (7/10)

Satisfactory (5/10)

Unsatisfactory (3/10)

Fits with criteria

/10

Appropriately choose an

AIS/ERP that fits. understanding of the nature and purpose of

the business

Evidence of

understanding of the nature and purpose of the business

Adequacy

of understanding of the nature and purpose of the business

Reports that choose

systems/software not relevant will lose marks from this category.

Type/Score

Very Good (15/15)

Good (11/15)

Satisfactory (9/15)

Unsatisfactory (5/15)

Presentation and

writing style

 

 

 

/15 marks

Information is well organized.

Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length.

 

Very well written, excellent paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout.

Information is

organized, Correct layout including times new roman, font size

12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length.

 

Well written, some paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation

Information is

somewhat organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect.

 

Proper grammar and punctuation mostly used, but overuse of direct quotes.

Information is poorly

organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect.

 

Proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Excessive overuse of direct quotes

Type/Score

Very Good (15/15)

Good (11/15)

Satisfactory (9/15)

Unsatisfactory (5/15)

Introduction

 

 

 

/15 marks

Introduces the topic of the

research report in an extremely

engaging manner which arouses the reader`s interest.

 

Gives a detailed general background and indicates the overall "plan".

Introduces the topic

of the research report

in an engaging manner which arouses the reader`s interest.

 

Gives some general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the report.

Satisfactorily

introduces the topic

of the research report.

 

Gives a general background.

 

Indicates the overall

"plan" of the report.

Introduces the topic

of the research

report, but omits a general background of the topic and/or

 

the overall "plan" of the report.

Type/Score

Very Good (20/20)

Good (15/20)

Satisfactory (10/20)

Unsatisfactory (7/20)

Criteria

completion

/20

Evidence of understanding of

the nature and purpose of the business.

Evidence of understanding of the implications for the company

The chosen

software/system has the capacity to address challenges identified within the business.

Evidence of

understanding of the implications for the company

You gain marks for

ensuring that all of the points mentioned above as challenges within the business are covered in your report by the chosen software / system.

 

 

Assessment Criteria:

 

Type/Score

Very Good (10/10)

Good (7/10)

Satisfactory (5/10)

Unsatisfactory (3/10)

Evidence of

Research

 

/10 marks

Substantial range of

appropriate and current, supportive evidence

Good range of

appropriate and current, supportive evidence.

Suitable range of

supportive evidence used. Not always appropriate and/or current. Minimum cited.

Insufficient range or

number of supportive evidence used.

Type/Score

Very Good (20/20)

Good (15/20)

Satisfactory (10/20)

Unsatisfactory (7/20)

Development of

Discussion

 

 

 

 

/20 marks

Logical, insightful, original

discussion with well-connected paragraphs.

 

Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and detailed analysis.

Detailed, original

discussion develops logically with some connection between adjoining paragraphs.

 

Understanding of reading shown. Some relevant analysis.

Adequate discussion

develops logically.

 

Understanding of reading shown. Few relevant analysis.

Inadequate discussion

of issues and/or lacking in logical flow

 

Little/no demonstrated understanding of reading.

 

None/little discussion or analysis.

Type/Score

Very Good (5/5)

Good (4/5)

Satisfactory (3/10)

Unsatisfactory (2/10)

Conclusion

 

 

 

/5 marks

An interesting, well written

summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided.

A good summary of

the main points.

 

A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided.

Satisfactory

summary of the main points.

 

A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material.

Poor/no summary of

the main points.

 

A poor final comment on the subject and/or new material introduced.

Type/Score

Very Good (5/5)

Good (4/5)

Satisfactory (3/10)

Unsatisfactory (2/10)

Referencing

 

 

 

/5 marks

Correct referencing (Harvard)

All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged.

 

All paraphrased material acknowledged.

 

Correctly set out reference list and bibliography included.

Mostly correct

referencing (Harvard)

 

All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged.

Mostly correct setting

out reference list and bibliography included.

Mostly correct

referencing (Harvard) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material

 

Some problems with the reference list or bibliography.

Not all material

correctly acknowledged.

 

Some problems with the reference list or bibliography.

Total

/100 marks

 

 

 

 

Final marks

/20

 

 

 

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions