Brief for Petitioner Question

Brief for Petitioner Question

The primary theme of the paper is Brief for Petitioner Question in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $99 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

Brief for Petitioner Question

INSTRUCTIONS:

I will send all instructions via email this is a link to a website that should help substantially with the research. http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/United_States_v_Wurie_No_111792_2013_BL_132891_2013_ILRC_1959_1st

CONTENT:
No. 13 - 212IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES______________________________________________________________________________UNITED STATESPetitionerv.BRIMA WURIERespondent______________________________________________________________________________ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THEUNITED STATESCOURT OF APPEALS FOR THEFIRST CIRCUIT______________________________________________________________________________Brief for PetitionerQuestion PresentedUnder the Fourth Amendment, can the police conduct a warrantless search of an arrestee`s cell phone if it poses as a source of evidence or information relevant to the investigation?TABLE OF CONTENTSQuestion Presented......................................................................................................................iTable of Authorities................................................................................................................... iiiOpinions Below….......................................................................................................................1Statement of Jurisdiction….........................................................................................................1Constitutional Provisions involved..............................................................................................1Statement of The Case………………..........................................................................................2Summary of Argument………….................................................................................................4Argument ……….........................................................................................................................5 * THE WARRANTLESS SEARCH OF THE RESPONDENTS CELL PHONE DID NOT VIOLATE THE RESPONDENT`S RIGHTS AS PROVIDED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT……………………………………………. * THE COURT OF APPEALS RULING SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED BLANKET PROHIBITION AND CONTRADICTS DECISIONS OF FOURTH, FIFTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS...…………………….………………… * THE SEARCH WAS REASONABLE IN ACCORDANCE TO PREVAILING CIRCU...
 
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions