REQUIRED TO UNDERTAKE THE PHYSICAL DESIGN

The primary theme of the paper is REQUIRED TO UNDERTAKE THE PHYSICAL DESIGN in which you are required to emphasize its aspects in detail. The cost of the paper starts from $105 and it has been purchased and rated 4.9 points on the scale of 5 points by the students. To gain deeper insights into the paper and achieve fresh information, kindly contact our support.

Objectives

In Assessment Item 2, you willcomplete your final network design report for the scenario given on page 5based on the written and oral feedback received on your Assessment Item 1. Please refer to the Unit Profile to understand how this assessment item relates to the Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs). You are expected to participate in the weekly discussions and find the answers to the recommended discussion questions. The weekly discussion questions have been selected and formulated not only to gradually increase your knowledge and skills in this unit but also to help you develop the logical and physical network designs. If you do not attempt weekly discussion questions, you would very likely produce a logical network design that would not satisfy the requirements and/or that cannot be justified.

Requirements

Starting from the logical design of the network that you completed in Assessment Item 1, you are required to undertake the physical design of the network taking into consideration the feedback that you receivedin Assessment Item 1.

In order to undertake your physical design, you may need to make further justifiable assumptions.You also have tocomplete your final networkdesign report.It should also contain a brief reflection justifying how your work in this unit has satisfied the unit learning outcomes. The reflection should be supported by the agreed outcomes of the weekly discussion questions. Please refer to the unit profile to see how this assessment item relates to ULOs.

Your report should include the following:

Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Project Goal
Project Scope
Design requirements
1. Business Goals and Constraints
2. Technical Goals and Tradeoffs
3. User Communities and Network Applications
4. List of Assumptions
Logical Network Design
1. The logical network diagrams including addressing and naming
2. The explanation and justification of your logical design
3. The list of routing and switching protocols, and security mechanisms
Physical Network Design
1. The final network diagram
2. The table of networking & communication devices and applications required, including the cost of each of them, the IP addresses, the product numbers as well as the approximate total cost
3. The explanation and justification for the selection of the devicesand applications required
4. A test plan that can be used to test the new network
5. One detailed test script for your test plan.
Brief Reflection (maximum two A4 pages): Justify how your work in this unit has satisfied the Unit Learning Outcomes. For your justification, you should use your contributions to the weekly discussion questions as supporting material. You also need to include one thing that you liked about this unit giving the reason.Also, suggest an improvement to the unit with the justification. Use the list of headings given below for your brief reflection:
1. Prepare the user, business and security requirements of the organisation in relation to network design.
2. Analyse the user, business and security requirements.
3. Compare and contrast the possible alternative logical and physical network designs.
4. Design a network by applying the top-down network design methodology.
5. Create the final documentation of the designed network.
6. Justify that the designed network satisfies the requirements.
7. One thing you liked the most about this unit.
8. One suggestion to improve the unit.

Note: Additional information regarding this assignment may be placed on the unit website. Please check the unit website at least once a week for further information relating to this report.Please ensure that you write your answers in your own words to avoid possible plagiarism and copyright violation. You can understand the Plagiarism Procedures by following the corresponding link in the CQUniversity Policies section of the Unit Profile.

Assessment criteria

The marking criteria for Assessment Item 2 are provided on page 3.

You need to familiarise yourself with the marking criteria to ensure that you have addressed them when preparing this assessment item.

Marking Criteria

Section

Max Mark

Mark

3.7

3.4

3.3

2.9

2.6

2.5

1.9

0.95

1. Executive summary

Covered all the sections of the report

Contained all sections but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing sections.

Not clear but contained most sections.

Not clear and most sections missing.

2. Table of contents

Used decimal notation. Included all headings and page numbers. Used ToC auto-generation.

One feature was missing.

A few features missing.

Included only the main headings.

ToC missing.

3. Project Goal

Set the scene for the project and described the purpose clearly.

Contained all parts but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing parts.

Not clear but contained most parts.

Not clear and most parts missing.

4. Project Scope

Set the scope for the project and described the boundaries clearly.

Contained all parts but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing parts.

Not clear but contained most parts.

Not clear and most parts missing.

5. Design requirements

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.4

a) Business Goals and Constraints

Thorough accurate list.

A few inaccuracies in the list.

One or two items missing.

Many items missing.

Not clear or vague description.

b) Technical Goals and Tradeoffs

Thorough accurate list.

A few inaccuracies in the list.

One or two items missing.

Many items missing.

Not clear or vague description.

c) User Communities and Network Applications

Thorough accurate list.

A few inaccuracies in the list.

One or two items missing.

Many items missing.

Not clear or vague description.

d) List of Assumptions

Thorough accurate list.

A few inaccuracies in the list.

One or two items missing.

Many items missing.

Not clear or vague description.

6. Logical Network Design

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.4

a) Logical network diagrams including addressing and naming.

Covered all the information of the network.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

b) Explanation and justification of your logical design.

Covered all the information.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

e) List of routing and switching protocols, and security mechanisms.

Covered all the information.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

7. Physical Network Design

3.7

3.4

3.3

2.9

2.6

2.5

1.9

0.95

a) Final network diagram.

Covered all the sections of the network.

Contained all sections but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing sections.

Not clear but contained most sections.

Not clear and most sections missing.

b) Table of devices, software and total cost estimation.

Thorough accurate list.

A few inaccuracies in the list.

One or two items missing.

Many items missing.

Not clear or vague description.

c) The explanation and justification of b).

Covered all the sections of the network.

Contained all sections but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing sections.

Not clear but contained most sections.

Not clear and most sections missing.

d) The test plan that can be used to test the network.

Covered all the information of the network.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

e) The detailed test script for one of the tests in the test plan.

Covered all the information.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Presentation

2.75

2.55

2.5

2.25

2.2

1.95

1.9

1.5

1.45

0.75

Structure, spellings and grammar

Grammar and structure excellent. Minimal or no spelling errors.

Occasional lapse in grammar but good structure. A few spelling errors.

Grammar and/or structure should be improved.

Frequent errors in grammar and spelling or poor structure.

Poor writing and structure.

Justification of successfully achieving Unit Learning Outcomes or lessons learned

1.5

1.25

0.5

Prepare the user, business and security requirements of the organisation in relation to network design.

Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Analyse the user, business and security requirements.

Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Compare and contrast the possible alternative logical and physical network designs.

Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Design a network by applying the top-down network design methodology.

Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Create the final documentation of the designed network.

Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Justify that the designed network satisfy the requirements.

Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions.

Contained all information but not enough detail.

Had too brief or missing information.

Not clear but contained most information.

Not clear and most information missing.

Your opinion about the unit

One thing you liked the most.

One suggestion for improvement.

Plagiarism penalty

Late submission penalty

Total

REQUIRED TO UNDERTAKE THE PHYSICAL DESIGN