|
Content & knowledge of key sustainability theories and frameworks –
· Breadth/depth of knowledge
· Use of literature/evidence of research)
· An ability to apply these appropriately to ‘real world’ case studies
(15 Marks)
|
1,2,3,5,6
|
Assignment work demonstrates appropriate selection and integration of theory.
Able to consider and expand on topics and issues in the broader disciplinary context.
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content.
Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.
Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
|
Assignment demonstrates good selection and integration of theory.
Able to consider topics and issues in the broader disciplinary context.
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content.
Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
|
Sound knowledge of principles and concepts. Relevant key theories, ideas are included in the work in an appropriate manner.
Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.
Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to some real world case studies.
|
Knowledge of principles and concepts sufficient to communicate intelligently about the topic.
Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner.
Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.
Some ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
|
Knowledge of principles and concepts insufficient to communicate intelligently about the topic.
Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.
If evident, key ideas are presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner.
Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts presented in the Unit of Study
Limited ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
|
|
Present your strategy clearly and cogently to your peer group -
· Clarity in explanation – clearly structured, developing argument
· Presentation skills
· Recommendations for future practice.
· Use of respectful language to discuss all people; avoiding emotive language; employing inclusive, non-sexist language.
(15 Marks)
|
|
Presentation is clearly structured with information presented to an audience that is understandable, supported by explanatory materials, clearly understood aurally, and includes recommendations for practice. Sophisticated level of professional language achieved.
|
Presentation is clearly structured with information presented to an audience that is understandable, supported by some explanatory materials, clearly understood aurally, and includes limited recommendations for practice and use of respectful language.
|
Presentation is well structured with information presented to an audience that is understandable, supported by some explanatory materials, clearly understood aurally, and includes some recommendations for practice. . Solid level of professional language used.
|
Presentation is reasonably structured with information presented to an audience that is mostly understandable, supported by limited explanatory materials, adequately understood aurally, and includes limited recommendations for practice. Only general level of professional language achieved
|
Presentation is poorly structured with information presented to an audience that lacks clarity, has limited supporting materials, mot clearly understood aurally, and lacks any recommendations for practice. Language not professional, inclusive or respectful.
|
|
Peer engagement -
· Students’ understanding demonstrated through reflection on their own experiences in collaborative or shared work
· Prompt response to questioning
(10 Marks)
|
|
Presentation shows critical reflection on your own experiences and reflects the evaluation and synthesis of peer proposals and responses. Further, responses to questions are prompt and comprehensive.
|
Presentation shows some critical reflection on your own experiences and reflects some evaluation and synthesis of views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are prompt and comprehensive.
|
Presentation shows some reflection on your own experiences and reflects some evaluation and synthesis of views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are mostly prompt and comprehensive
|
Presentation shows some reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are reasonably prompt and mostly comprehensive
|
Presentation shows limited reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are lacking in promptness and comprehensiveness.
|
