Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Homework Area
Unit Title: Sport in Society
|
Unit Code: 5T5Z0018 |
Core: YES (SM |
Level: L5 |
|
|
only) |
|
Assignment Title: A critical review into the development of a current public sport policy
Assignment Task:
You are required to select, analyse and critique a current public sport policy that is promoted by the government and produce a report (2,500 words) that outlines the:
- Factors that have influenced the development of your chosen sport policy;
- The programmes and projects that have been implemented at the grassroots level to support the delivery of your chosen sport policy;
- Outcomes including key performance indicators used to measure its success.
Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed.
Analyse how public policy influences sport from a business and social perspective.
Evaluate how macro environmental factors influence the development and implementation of sport policy.
Assignment Details and Instructions.
Assignment Details:
Write a 2,500 word individual report (+/- 10%).
Students should select one of the three current sport policies that have been identified within the governments new sport strategy (Sporting Future: A New Strategy for an Active Nation).
Students should refer to the specific policy theory introduced in the lectures and tutorials to help them analyse and critically review their chosen sport policy.
Students are advised to be selective in the utilisation of the number of programmes and projects that have been implemented to support the delivery of your chosen sport policy. This is to avoid a descriptive account being provided of all the programmes and projects that could be attributed to your chosen sport policy. By way of a guideline, the selection of 2-4 programmes and projects will suffice to answer this specific part of the assessment brief.
Students should also refer to the five outcomes identified in ‘Sporting Future: A New
Strategy for an Active Nation) when answering this specific part of the assessment brief.
Further Instructions:
A number of formative workshops will be scheduled during the lectures and tutorials to provide guidance and additional information on this assessment. Students are required to attend these sessions to ensure relevant engagement with this assessment.
The report should be written in an appropriate business-like format (see Moodle for further information).
Harvard referencing must be used.
Early Career/ World Class Professional Skills (PLOs) being assessed or developed/assessed.
This assessment will help students to develop their professional development skills and in particular focus on developing their understanding of the political and policy landscape of the sport industry. By completing this assessment, students will also develop their information gathering capabilities and critically evaluate how public sport policies are developed and implemented to the grassroots level. These skills are considered essential for students as they begin to develop as an Early Career /World Professional Skills within the sports industry.
Specifically, this assessment supports the development and assessment of the following Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs):
PLO1 – Our graduates will apply critical thinking to practical and theoretical problems.
- This assessment involves students to critically review a recent sport policy including why it has been developed, how it has been developed and how it is measured.
PLO2 - Our graduates will be effective communicators using a range of media.
- This assessment involves students producing a professional report.
PLO5 - Our graduates will develop subject specific knowledge and skills in their programme discipline.
- This assessment will help students to develop their specific knowledge of how policies are developed and delivered in sport.
In addition to content feedback, students will be given feedback on your skills development and areas requiring further improvement to enhance your progress as an Early Career Professional.
Resources
See Reading List on Moodle
Marking Criteria * See below
Group Work Guidelines (If applicable) N/A
Unit Specification
See Moodle
Assessment Marking Criteria* - SiS Assessment 1
|
Assessment |
0-19% |
20-34% |
35-39% |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-85% |
86-100% |
|
|
descriptor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Structure and |
Unstructured |
Unclear and |
Basic structure |
Adequate |
Good structure to |
Very good |
Excellent structure |
Outstanding |
|
|
writing style |
presentation of |
confused |
used. Some |
structure used. |
the report. |
structure to the |
which shows |
structure and flow |
|
|
(20%) |
report. Some |
structured used. |
incoherent sections |
Sufficient detail in |
Appropriate use of |
report. |
innovative flow |
throughout. |
|
|
Work is |
absent sections |
Some sections |
that lack flow. |
sections but |
|
between report |
|
|
|
|
academic |
Good use of |
Complex language |
|
||||||
|
appropriately |
(i.e. introduction, |
missing (i.e. |
Incomplete/ limited |
completely |
sections. |
|
|||
|
language. |
academic |
and syntax. |
|
||||||
|
structured, logical |
conclusions). |
introduction, |
detail to sections. |
descriptive. |
|
|
|||
|
Appropriate |
language. Precise |
Excellent use of |
Outstanding |
|
|||||
|
and organised. |
|
conclusions). |
|
|
|
||||
|
Inappropriate |
Poor use of |
Acceptable, |
syntax, few |
syntax. |
academic language, |
grammar used |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Appropriate |
language and |
Very poor use of |
academic language, |
language, |
spelling or |
|
sophisticated |
throughout. |
|
|
syntax; |
language, syntax |
too many spelling |
grammar and |
grammatical |
|
syntax. Excellent |
|
|
|
|
language, |
|
|
|
||||||
|
unacceptable |
and spelling; |
errors, bad |
syntax. Still needs |
errors. |
|
spelling and |
|
|
|
|
grammar, syntax |
|
|
|
||||||
|
grammar and |
extremely poor |
grammar. |
to be more |
|
|
grammar. |
|
|
|
|
and spelling is |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
spelling. |
grammar. |
|
academic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Content (30%) |
Little or no |
There is an |
There is a partial |
The report has |
There is a careful |
There is a |
There is originality |
An innovative and |
|
|
Find, evaluate and |
attempt to collect, |
inadequate |
attempt to collect, |
collected, |
approach to the |
thorough |
in the collection, |
thorough approach |
|
|
synthesise |
analyse and |
attempt to collect, |
analyse and critique |
analysed, and |
collection, analyse |
approach to the |
analyse and critique |
to the collection, |
|
|
information from |
critique |
analyse and |
information from |
critiqued |
and critique of |
collection, analyse |
of information from |
analyse and critique |
|
|
a variety of |
information from |
critique |
primary and |
information from |
information from |
and critique of |
primary and |
of information from |
|
|
sources, including |
primary and |
information from |
secondary sources |
primary and |
primary and |
information from |
secondary sources |
primary and |
|
|
policy theory and |
secondary sources |
primary and |
as related to your |
secondary sources |
secondary sources |
primary and |
as related to your |
secondary sources as |
|
|
theory related to |
as related to your |
secondary sources |
chosen sport policy. |
as related to your |
as related to your |
secondary sources |
chosen sport policy, |
related to the chosen |
|
|
your chosen sport |
chosen policy. |
as related to your |
|
chosen sport |
chosen sport |
as related to your |
bringing insight to |
sport policy, bringing |
|
|
policy. |
|
chosen policy. |
|
policy. |
policy. |
chosen sport |
the analysis. |
original insight to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policy. |
|
analysis. |
|
|
3 Analysis (40%) |
Links between |
Links between |
Links between |
Links between |
Links between |
Links between |
Links between |
Links between policy |
|
|
Apply skills of |
policy theory and |
policy theory and |
policy theory and |
policy theory and |
policy theory and |
policy theory and |
policy theory and |
theory and your |
|
|
research and |
your chosen sport |
your chosen sport |
your chosen sport |
your chosen sport |
your chosen sport |
your chosen sport |
your chosen sport |
chosen sport policy |
|
|
critical analysis to |
policy are absent, |
policy are |
policy are |
policy are |
policy are |
policy are |
policy are evaluated |
are evaluated |
|
|
critically |
or confused or |
confused or |
inadequate and |
constructed but |
analysed. |
evaluated. |
critically. |
critically, with |
|
|
evaluating your |
wrong. |
wrong. |
largely descriptive. |
remain mainly |
|
|
|
original insight. |
|
|
sport policy. |
|
|
|
descriptive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Referencing |
No referencing |
Very few |
Some references |
Adequate Harvard |
Appropriate |
Through and |
Sophisticated |
Authoritative |
|
|
(10%) |
apparent. |
references, poor in |
and in text citations. |
referencing and in |
Harvard |
sufficient |
referencing and |
referencing and in |
|
|
Consistent and |
|
text citations. Poor |
Not in the Harvard |
text citations, but |
referencing, |
referencing. |
precise in text |
text citations. |
|
|
appropriate |
|
use of Harvard |
style or |
still some |
Sufficient in text |
Largely precise in |
citations. |
|
|
|
referencing and in |
|
style. |
inconsistently |
inconsistences, |
citations, more |
text citations. |
|
|
|
|
text citations. |
|
|
applied. |
some |
needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inappropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions